• UniSA Pathways Colloquium

    My trip down to the Springfield campus of UniSQ was smooth and uneventful. The hotel was lovely and I was able to stop as see my colleagues at the Bundaberg Campus on the way down too. There was around 50 to 60 people attending the Colloquium in person but more tuned in online for the keynote and panel discussions.

    Andrew Harvey did an excellent presentation around access to higher education. It was that big picture sort of policy stuff with a heap of pretty graphs and statistics. I was privileged to have a quick chat with him beforehand.

    Then there was the panel discussion and they are always excellent. A man was brave enough to ask a question DURING their parts. I understand why, there was only about 50 people there and the atmosphere was relaxed. Anyway because he did I piped up too. They were talking about community and connection and I asked how to NOT make it tokenistic. I got a great response from Andrew which included ideas around being consistent across the whole process, not rushing, etc. I then, quite bravely, suggested that sounded like it would need “stable, long-term funding”. The chuckles in the crowd and the knowing looks I got from the panel were GOLD. I loved it. A gentlemen approached me later and said “your the women who asked the good questions” – he could only see the back of my head so he wasn’t sure it was me. I laughed!

    My own presentation was good. I was in a concurrent session with Sarah Hattam so naturally she had the majority of the audience. I was ok with that. It went smoothly.

    The other stand out presentation was from Charmaine Davis and Jonathon Green. They were talking about Enabling Education as an emerging discipline. They did a fairly serious literature review AND then also compared the literature in Enabling to Higher Education literature more generally. Not a heap of surprises in their finding but DARN that is going to be a well cited article when it comes out. So useful to have the analysis to back up things we know anecdotally.

    I am back to reality now. Marking right before the deadline. Sigh.

  • The marking void!

    When I was a sessional I used to joke with my supervisor that I would do all of the teaching for free if I could just get $400 an hour for marking. That is what my job feels like! The teaching and the research is fun. I love it. I really would do it for free. But marking – now that is hard work. Really hard!

    Marking requires focus and concentration, attention to detail and a really solid understanding of the content. Those are the easy skills. You also have to ensure consistency and adherance to procedures. You have to communicate clearly to your colleagues but also in the feedback that you give to students. And providing feedback to students is not a simple matter at all. Their emotional reactions matter. Their learning matters. It all matters. Not to mention the emotional labour associated as we feel empathy for those that fail and frustration at those students who could have done better (perhaps if they had “just listened” or “if only they had attended more classes”).

    I work 3.5 days a week now. But I can assure you that during the marking periods I do considerably more hours. No one and I mean NO ONE ever asks for those hours back as time in lieu (we call it compensatory time). No one does! We know marking is just part of our job. But for that 2 week turn-around period we do extra hours – wel all do. And the estimates from the university for how long it takes to mark each students work are laughable. I mean it is true that I can mark a good (high distinction) assessment in the allotted time – because there is minimal comments – most of which I can copy and paste. But a student that is a borderline fail – is going to take me double the allotted time to mark. Then I’m going to send it off to be moderated (near fails always get looked at by another marker), and have to look at it again when it comes back to me with my colleagues comments. Of course I am ALSO looking at the near fails and fails of my colleagues.

    The two-week turn around is very strict and that includes late submissions. So while it seems like it is only 2 weeks of marking it can drag out and look more like 3 weeks easily. Conservatively, that is 2 weeks per assessment, 3 assessments per term. Two teaching terms in a year – so technically 12 weeks a year of what I call the marking void – where nothing else – and I mean NOTHING else gets done. 12 less than ideal weeks, 5 weeks of annual leave, and 35 great weeks that I love. I really am not complaining that is a pretty good deal.

    It does surprise me that none of us take back that extra time spent marking. Maybe one day I will try it – try to change the culture so that we still have 12 weeks in the marking void – but then we have 12 weeks where we go home early to compensate.

    In other news. I am presenting at the Learning and Teaching Conference (internal thing here at CQUniversity) tomorrow. It is for the meme project that I’m doing with Katrina and Byron. Should be fun!

  • Phoning students – Is it worth it?

    I work in the STEPS program and we absolutley pride ourselves on the student experience. Most of our students are regional, remote, low socio-economic status or both. We also have higher-than-average numbers of Indigenous students and those with a disability. Part of my job is assessing their levels of engagement early in each term. I have a number of tools to do that but to me the most reliable one is Moodle which shows me a log of how many times they logged in, which areas they clicked on and so on.

    I have an on-campus group and also an online group. This term on day 1 my on-campus group was 32 students but it has been up to 43. My online group is usually a bit bigger so usually close to 40 students and this term, 40 exactly. Remember I work 2.5 days per week. I have only JUST switched over to 3.5 days per week (0.7 FTE).

    In week one I make some phone calls after that first class. I call every on-campus student that wasn’t there and I call every online student who has not yet logged on to Moodle. This term that took me all morning – so about 4 hours. Now in that time I also made a coffee and drank it at my desk. I walked a lap around the building that takes me about 4 minutes to get my step count up. I believe I went to a colleagues office to try and help them with a Zetero/referencing issue which took at least a few minutes. AND I checked emails as they came in.

    To phone these students I had to have Moodle open (to check their last login time) and another program which has their contact details, a separate program where I record my attempt to contact them, plus my email as well as the role. So it’s not THAT complicated to make these phone calls but it’s still more complicated than phoning a friend on my mobile phone would be.

    I can’t even remember how many phone calls I made this term but I would estimate from a total of 72 students it would have been almost half (that had not come to class or engaged online by the end of week one). So can I take the liberty of guessing and calling it 30 students (round number). Of that 30 students MOST do NOT answer their phone. 1 or 2 might be disconnected. Others I can leave a message and then send a follow-up email. Some don’t have any sort of message bank, so it is just an email noting a missed call from myself. I have a template for the email so it only takes a short time. I’ve also perfected my voice message after much practice! 🙂

    So I would estimate that from 30 phonecalls I might actually speak to 5 to 10 students. And so I wonder – is that 4 hours a total waste of my time?

    Well this term there was really only 4 students that I spoke to and they were rather typical and so stuck in my mind – prompting me to write this blog and to answer that question.

    First there was a guy who thought he was an online student. He apologised profusley and has attended every class since. This happens most terms with at least a couple of students.

    Second there was a student who had just got a full time job and really couldn’t find the time to study. With one email she was withdrawn but I got to congratulate her on her job over the phone and I am certain she could hear the sinserity in my voice. I made a point of telling her that she could come back to study at any point in the future with no penalties etc. She was incredilbly thank-ful and I am CERTAIN that one phonecall greatly improved her “student experience”.

    Third there was a student that had just moved house and was so anxious about being behind in her study that she had not had the nerve to reach out. I think they said something like “I know I should have reached out for help but I just didn’t know what to say”. I talked to this student for about 30 minutes and helped them understand what to prioritise and where to focus their energy regarding study. I must have said “you can do this – remember one step at a time” at least twice in that conversation. By the end they were feeling more confident – even if that was only that they were confident they knew who to ask for help (me!).

    Lastly there was a student who was so overwhlemed with the 3 units they were enrolled in that they burst into tears on the phone. I spent at least 10 minutes just calming them down. Then I would say another 40 miunutes listening to their situation and then explaining both the unit, the assessments etc, and also different options to them including reducing the number of units they were doing, withdrawing completely etc etc. This student withdrew in the end but again, I think that improved student experience may impact them to try again at some point in the future.

    So you COULD say that from those 4 hours I actually had a meaningful interaction with 4 students and 2 withdrew anyway. So MAYBE I “saved” 2 students for all that effort!!!! Was it worth it?

    I want to let you decide for yourself but I say yes and a sentence here’s why –

    The ripple effect.

    I like to believe that the emails I sent, the voicemail messages I left as well as the interaction with those 4 students improved their student experience at least a little. Each one of those students may withdraw now but return to study next term, next year, or ten years from now and that positive experience might just push them in the right direction to do it. They might encourage their networks – friends, family, children, neighbours – to take on university study. They may in turn encourage others and so the ripples get bigger and bigger. One of those people migth find a cure for cancer or develop a new *INSERT SOMETHING AMAZING HERE.

    I don’t just tell myself this to make myself FEEL better – I KNOW that this is how the world works. I have interviewed enough students to know that so MANY of them had “a person” that encouraged them to come to university – someone who believed in them – someone who told them that they could do it and they believed them. Heck I had that in MY journey too.

    So I have to take the stance that my efforts are NOT fruitless, even if they may appear that way on some level. My time, my investment in these students may change their lives, their attitude to unviersities or even just brighten their day slightly. So I try to forget about the “company line” and the pressure to improve retention and success, to improve the student experience and all the other things the unviersity tells me I have to do. I try and remember the people, the moments, the relief I hear in their voices, the confidence I see at the end of term – as I said I try to remember those little moments and know that they DO make a difference. I hope we can all improve the world, one little moment at a time.

  • Proud to report some achievements … and some set backs!

    First of all I had an absolutley marvelous time at the Student Success Conference! It was my first one and it felt like home. I knew more people than I expected to but I think that is because now NAEEA has partnered with this conference. So many enabling program people there! It was SO encouraging!

    I did two presentations and a poster. The poster was the Meme project and we got a LOT of interest. I had my speel perfected after the first morning tea. I essentially explained that we were not trying to learn how we could use memes to help students – we are looking at it the opposite way – What can we learn about the student experience from the memes that they engage with? Our poster had all the important stuff – plus a heap of memes that students have sent us. It was a hit 🙂

    The first presentation was on the Wellbeing SIG edited book and although I only had about 12 people it got good questions and feedback. The book is on Trauma aware teaching, so a popular topic I think.

    The final presentation was with Trixie James and Gemma Mann so instantly it was going to be fun! We presented findings from the autoethnography we did about student support. We wanted to explore the definition of student support – we believe there is not a consistent definition and that has negative impacts on staff and students. For example, the line between the lecturer counselling the student or referring them to the couselling services can be blurred and ultimatley it becomes a lot of emotional labour and can lead to burnout.

    We had 30 or maybe more in that session including Cathy Stone. A great little discussion got going at the end. Lots of questions asked and people came up to us later and complimented us on the project. As the project was originally my idea it made me feel pretty jolly awesome.

    Overall Student Success Conference 2025 – totally marvelous, very enjoyable, learnt a lot, fun fun fun and a total success.

    Th other achievement(s) lately is the NAEEA Seed grants. So these are small ($2500) grants offered to the Special Interest Groups (SIGs) and I lead one for the Self- Efficacy SIG that I facilitate and I was also listed on the Wellbeing SIG. We got both!!!!!! Woot Woot!!!

    So the Wellbeing SIG is the edited book and I am going to be a section editor, plus I have also submitted a chapter proposal. Ang Jones is leading it – can’t wait!

    The Self-Efficacy grant project is to create a Toolkit for improving Self-efficacy – so it’s very complimentary to my PhD. Trixie, Ang and Amy Robinson is on that team so it’s going to be a world of fun but I’m also confident that we’ll get it done.

    I have also been offered full time work. I have recently gone from 0.5 to 0.7 so that was a blessing but full time would be excellent. I’m just not sure I could handle it to be honest – not while I’m still trying to get my PhD done. I have made some progress in that area… but not a lot.

    So all wonderful news there I guess. In other news, I am taking another break from my PhD. I just have too much going on at the moment in my personal life and I feel like a camel with an awful lot of straws on my back! It’s going to be medical leave, with a letter from my psychologist. So that ties back to the offer of full time work. I still have some time to think about it.

    As it stands I work about 30 hours a week and get paid for 25 so I really SHOULD accept at least some fraction incease – at LEAST up to 0.8. I’ll let you know!

  • May? My goodness!

    Well I’m not quite sure how it ended up the end of April with May just around the corner! I have been lost in marking recently and attempting to balance that and the personal grief I am still going through.

    The NAEEA SIGs are going well and both groups got our papers submitted by the respective deadlines. New projects are budding but I’ll try to write more about those later.

    My fraction is going to increase from 0.5 to 0.7 in the middle of the year and I am looking forward to that.

    I am also looking forward to some time off at the end of May and the Student Success conference in July. So far I have had a poster and an Emerging Initiaitive accepted. I have two more submissions that I am still waiting to hear about (the due date for feedback hasn’t passed yet). The university is funding the registration and I am feeling quite blessed by that. This year it is in Cairns, so I am going to drive up and I paid for the more expensive but fancy accommodation because I wanted to treat myself.

    The book that Trixie James and I have a chapter in has still not come out and Susan Emmett and I are also waiting for Australian Journal of Adult Learning to release it’s next issue. The last couple of years they have had issues in April, July and November so we are expecting it any day now. Same with the book! It has been a very long process for both of those. I am hoping the next couple of publications happen a little faster. That includes the Special Issue from the NAEEA conference and the Student Success one as well (that is assuming the submitted articles are accepted).

    I have not done a lot of PhD work lately as I’ve been drowning in both self-pity and marking. However I have done a couple of focus groups and got some great data. I’ve also bolstered up large chunks of the literature review and I’m feeling pretty ok about that for now. I’m going to move on and write the methodology section if I can just get the courage to start that!

    Well that pretty much covers a general update for now. Till next time!

  • Minor Revisions!

    I was overjoyed to receive a “Minor revisions required” on what I have called “The COVID article” that I wrote with Dr. Susan Emmett. Sue and I originally wrote the article in 2021 or MAYBE 2022. It has been desk rejected at least 3 times, but I think 4 times. We submitted it to this journal almost a year and a half ago (September, 2023) but we got it back with just minor edits to make. I am so delighted 🙂 Win!

    In other news – also very good – CQUniversity has officially offered me an extra day per week starting mid-year. That will mean more teaching (yay!) probably some unit coordination opportunities (yay!) and more marking too (UN-yay! No one likes marking). I will still be classified as Teaching and Research (not Teaching focused) so I will still have plenty of time for study and publishing.

    I have re-done my whiteboard after achieving 25 “research outputs” so now the new goal is 30 peer-reviewed publications by 2030. I have 11 so far – after that last “minor revisions” there is 2 in press – so 13 out of 30. That means I have 5 years to get 17 publications, 3 or 4 per year. I think it is very achievable. In fact I have already got the following planned and at various stages:

    1. PhD article 1 – Scoping Lit Review – almost ready to resubmit.
    2. PhD article 2 – partially written.
    3. Intersectionality article – More data analysis to do but some writing has also been done.
    4. Wellbeing SIG autoethnography – will be submitted within 6 months
    5. Self-efficacy SIG autoethnography – Will be submitted in March to the Special Issue
    6. Meme Project – paper should be written this year, submitted early next year.
    7. Grant project – Data analysis done, just begun drafting the first article.
    8. TAFE project – Data analysis partially done, some sections written.
    9. FedUni internal grant paper – just submitted.

    So there is plenty “in the pipelines” for sure. Now I see that long list I am going to stop writing here and go write something on the list!

  • 25 by 2025

    Originally I set myself the goal of having 25 publications by the END of 2025. That was when my PhD was going to be via publication and I had the capacity to work on more projects at once. Since I have taken the RTP stipend I have had less time, and now, because of personal issues, I’ve got less “space”. So I reviewed this goal, realizing it was unachievable and decided to include conference presentations as well. I mean presentations, even if they don’t have a paper attached, even if it’s just the abstract that was peer-reviewed. So that is a new goal of 25 research outputs by the end of 2025!

    So…..

    I didn’t even realize it at first but I got my 25th one a few weeks ago – didn’t even need until the end of 2025! I did it by the start! 🙂

    Here is a picture of my whiteboard proudly displaying them!

    J= Journal article

    CBh = Book chapter

    P = Poster

    C = Conference presentation

    I should write a long list of thank-yous! To all my co-authors, to my supervisors, my friends and family that supported me to do this etc etc etc. But I’m going to assume they will never read this and that sentence covers it.

    I am focusing on the positive right now and THAT is it! Goal achieved!

    This year my research goals are…

    Self-efficacy SIG article 1 submitted

    Self-efficacy SIG article 2 planned

    Wellbeing SIG article 1 submitted

    Wellbeing SIG article 2 planned

    PhD article 1 re-submitted

    PhD article 2 submitted

    Intersectionality article submitted

    Grant article submitted

    Hmm that should keep me busy!

  • Welcome 2025

    Well the personal issues from last year have followed me into this year but I am solidering on! I did attempt to replace some of my loss with 2 new cats! They are adorable.

    So what are my goals for this year? Well I would like to get most of my thesis written in at least rough draft format. There is also 5 articles I would like submitted (in no particular order):

    1. The Wellbeing SIG autoethnography article
    2. The Self-efficacy SIG article
    3. The grant project article on discourses
    4. The OLD article with Bryce and David from FedUni
    5. PhD article

    I’m expecting a book chapter to come out this year and hopefully at least one of the articles above as well. It’s more likely that the five of them will be 2026 but that’s ok.

    My final goal it to introduce the Learning Disposition Wheel to my students and explicitly talk about learning with them using it. I’m hoping I can build it and turn it into an intervention that becomes a reserach project and fuel for a learning and teaching award. It’s the beginning of a long term plan I guess. See how it goes! I make no promises!

    Well I will leave it at that for now! Lots of work to do!

  • NAEEA 2024 Conference – Darwin +

    Sad news first of all. My principle supervisor Anna Fletcher has had to pull out due to some very serious health issues. It does not look good at all and I think Stuart, my remaining supervisor and I are both in a bit of shock. It has all happened quite quickly so no doubt Anna is too. She’s only young, probably early 50’s so it’s all rather horrific. I am trying to focus on the positives. Recently that has been the NAEEA conference!

    The picture above is my with the Self-Efficacy SIG poster. I had feedback from a couple of colleagues but most of it was my work and I’m quite proud of it. I have had other posters but in the past I’ve been only one person in a team and haven’t actually had that much input into the overall feel of the poster. This was my baby though!

    All 6 conference presentations went well. The one on trauma and self-care was a bit rushed at the end. SOOOOoooo much good has come of that though because I’ve now realised that Amy C, one of my favorite FedUni people works in that area and WE can do research TOGETHER on this! My pilot study only had 3 students BUT they explicitly explained how a past trauma had impacted their journey to university AND (more importantly) their self-efficacy. It is a huge gap in the enabling literature and Amy and I are going to fill it! Very excited about that… I DO need to get permission from my now solo supervisor I think.

    Another good thing to come from the conference was that it introduced me to a few teaching techniques. First is Mechano where one person makes a statement and then others can connect to that (physcially) by standing behind them (to back them up) or beside them to agree etc. The other they called snowballing where you write your idea on paper, scruntch it up, throw into the middle of the room, grab someone else’s and add to it… repeat! Both of these came from a workshop on the 4CTL Learning Disposition Wheel which is based on self-regulated learning.

    I think in enabling education where we like to explicitly teach it might be of value for me to use it exactly as they did in the workshop. They introduced it, then the activity was conducted and then we were asked which slice of the wheel we “used” the most in that activity. In other words which skills we needed, used, drew on etc. Different people choose different parts of the wheel because multiple were used in each activity… and that was the point! Use multiple wherever possible.

    Here is the wheel for reference – I got it from here (sorry it’s after 4pm I can’t be bothered to reference correctly!!!) https://www.4ctransformativelearning.org/the-learning-disposition-wheel

    I’m not sure what else to add about the conference. It was excellent all around. It had a great warm and friendly vibe to it. All the speakers were excellent, especially Sarah O’Shea. I felt like I knew a few people, from FedUni and CQUniversity of course but also Murdoch and other places too. I made a great contact with one of the folks from Macquarie University as well. I hope to get in touch with their senior teaching staff soon and welcome them into the Self-efficacy SIG.

    As I mentioned, after 4pm so that’s all for now. In summary great conference. Loved it.

  • PhD life goes on!

    I guess the initial excitement of being able to continue to receive the stipend (RTP Scholarship) payments has worn off a little, but then I look at my bank account and I am happy again! Despite this I am going to apply for a second part time position (online) and hope for the best. It’s unlikely that I will get it, so if I don’t post about it again, assume that!

    I have struggled with motivation a little bit lately but that is mainly due to personal issues that are still ongoing and the associated trauma which is still impacting my generally. I have however been very good at self-care lately and I am proud of that. I have lost weight, done more exercise than usual and taken the time to just walk around the building multiple times during the day. That is keeping my step count up, but improving my mood as well. The gardens and the weather here on campus are lovely. I’m also drinking more water… so you see all these things should be improving my performance at work. I’m just not sure if that is the case or not. I can say that I’m not a total mess and I have managed to keep going so perhaps it is just all balancing out!

    So my PhD is just ticking along. I’m doing little bits and pieces of the literature review and SLOWLY collecting data.

    The book chapter that I wrote with Ondine has finally come out! Perhaps I shouldn’t say finally, but it really FELT like a long process to get it published. It can be found here:

    Larsen, A., Bradbury, O. (2024). Examining Strategies to Support Teacher Self-Efficacy When Working with Diverse Student Groups: A Scoping Literature Review. In: Burke, J., Cacciattolo, M., Toe, D. (eds) Inclusion and Social Justice in Teacher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67612-3_5

    The same day that was live online the PhD article (scoping literature review number one) was rejected by a second journal. Again, perhaps there is balance there? Hahaha. That makes 10 publications for me and 2 this year so I am happy with that.

    The main thing I am working on at the moment is the NAEEA conference. The program is now available here: https://agentur.eventsair.com/naeeaconference2024/program

    If you do a search for my name across the 2 days you’ll see how busy I am making Powerpoints right now 🙂 I’m also working on some sections of my PhD literature review about defining and measuring equity groups. I DID have a non-teaching term, but I think that is about to change with my workload going over the limit NOW and then it will be under next year. That will likely mean I wont have as many online students and will be more on campus which is A-OK with me. I do like both but probably have a slight preference for on campus teaching.

    The final thing which I have done recently is my whiteboard. Before, I had the goal of 25 publications before the end of 2025. But with the hassle of switching my PhD to full time, back to part time, from via publication then back to a standard thesis – well with all that I didn’t think I was going to make it. Mostly because I had to withdraw from a few projects when my PhD went full time. I was rather sad looking at my whiteboard and knowing it was a goal I’d set for myself and wasn’t going to achieve.

    But then I had a bit of a brainwave and decided to change the criteria. Instead of it only being “publications” including journal articles and book chapters I decided I would ALSO include conference presentations. Even if only the abstract was peer-reviewed and it was just a presentation, (not a Conference Paper). So I erased the whole darn board and started again.

    So now instead of being “25 publications by the end of 2025” I say it’s “25 research outputs by the end of 2025″… so when the book chapter came out I added that on and it is the 23rd thing! Just TWO MORE to go!!! So I AM going to achieve that goal and that made me feel better! On that note, I shall sign off for now! 🙂